No. 219 · Strategy · Military and War
Asymmetric Warfare
A weaker side wins by refusing to fight on the stronger side’s terms.
In the Almanac
“The Soviets in Afghanistan”, 1979–1989 · “Monzo”, 2015–2024
Both stories in full, three ways to use it and where it misleads.
Get the AlmanacListen · Watch
Questions
What is Asymmetric Warfare?
Asymmetric Warfare describes conflicts where one side has far fewer resources and wins by refusing to fight on the stronger side's terms. The Afghan mujahideen used terrain and local support against the Soviet army, much as nimble fintech startups now chip away at large banks.
How do you use Asymmetric Warfare?
When you face a bigger rival or a daunting challenge, don't copy their strengths. Lean on your own advantages, such as speed, focus, or fresh perspective, look for unconventional approaches and unlikely allies, and change the rules of engagement where you can.
When does Asymmetric Warfare matter?
Asymmetric Warfare is one of the 56 mental models for strategy, the situations where you ask: How do I win when others want the same thing? Within that, it belongs to “Competing with rivals”, alongside Arms Race, Beachhead Strategy and Counter-Insurgency.
What is an example of Asymmetric Warfare?
Two stories show it at work: The Soviets in Afghanistan (1979–1989) and Monzo (2015–2024). Both are told in full in The Mental Models Daily Almanac, which has two stories for each of its 365 models.
Which mental models are related to Asymmetric Warfare?
Punching Above Your Weight, Lateral Thinking and Guerrilla Warfare. Asymmetric Warfare itself comes from military and war.